Housewife Ordered To Pay RM82,000 For Calling Bean Sprouts “Ugly”

"It's shocking, seriously, that someone would even dare to sell such ugly vegetables!"

Enlarge text
Cover ImageCover image via CNA
Logo

Follow us on InstagramTikTok, and WhatsApp for the latest stories and breaking news.

A housewife in Singapore has been ordered to pay SGD25,000 (about RM82,000) in damages after a court found her liable for defaming a company that imports and sells produce from Taiwan

According to a judgment released on Tuesday, 9 September, the case was brought by D'Season, which specialises in the import and sale of Taiwanese goods, against Sophia Wu Chao Wen over a Facebook post she made in March 2022.

In her post, Wu, who is originally from Taiwan, shared photos of kale and bean sprouts, alongside a screenshot from a Chinese article warning against eating blackened sprouts.

She wrote:

"It's shocking, seriously, that someone would even dare to sell such ugly vegetables! "Those who already paid are really unlucky! What 'organic veggies from Taiwan'?! This is basically poisonous vegetables! "Is it because they lack knowledge? "Or are they just turning a blind eye for money and asking everyone to pick out the good ones? A pack with this much bad stuff is toxic, and they still want customers to pick through it — that's just disregarding human life!! Honestly, back when I went to the market, even the vegetables that the vendor tossed on the ground for the rabbits were way better than this!"

She further compared the produce to food tossed on the ground for rabbits, and suggested that consuming it could send customers to the hospital, reported CNA.

The post, visible to her 410 Facebook friends, attracted 43 reactions

When asked where the vegetables came from, Wu referenced a past incident where D'Season allegedly sold overripe lychees in 2021.

D'Season later issued a letter of demand asking Wu to remove the post and publish an apology.

While she deleted the post, she did not apologise.

The company claimed that her statements implied it sold poisonous vegetables, cheated customers, and used chemicals while marketing them as organic.

SAYS.com
Image via CNA

Wu denied defaming the company, saying she only shared an article she believed to be true, and that she had no intent to link her comments to D'Season

She also claimed she deleted the post soon after.

The court, however, ruled that her words were defamatory as they would lead a reasonable reader to view the company as dishonest or improper.

The judge awarded D'Season SGD15,000 (about RM49,000) in general damages and SGD10,000 (about RM33,000) in special damages, with interest of 5.33% per annum until payment.

Read more trending stories on SAYS

You may be interested in: